Not all agents are equal. Some operate safely within defined scopes, while others drift into dangerous territory over time. Snapshots miss this reality. ClarioSec runs a continuous, drift-aware engine that identifies anomalies early, explains “why this matters,” and connects scores to enforcement actions.
Why Drift Matters
In autonomous ecosystems, drift accelerates: bots request broader scopes, chain new workflows, and traverse data across apps. A Slack bot that started with announcements may evolve to read private channels, pull HR data, and interact with Jira/Confluence. Without baselines and peer context, privilege creep becomes a silent liability.
ClarioSec compares each agent to its historical baseline and a peer cohort. If a service account begins creating users while peers never do—or a bot starts querying data it has never touched—the drift is flagged with severity, control mapping, and remediation hints.
How ClarioSec Scores Risk
We combine rules and behavioral models to produce a composite score—with full explainability:
- Baseline vs. real-time deviations — are actions outside normal patterns or past ranges?
- Permission changes — did scopes expand (read → write/admin), or roles inherit risky powers?
- Sequence-level anomalies — vectorized action traces highlight subtle, out-of-order behaviors.
- Peer comparison — do similar agents behave differently under similar conditions?
- Lateral-risk hints — cross-app paths that enable data movement or privilege escalation.
- Compliance mapping — ties every score to controls (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001).
Scores are categorized (Low/Medium/High/Severe) and paired with human-readable rationales. Thresholds are tunable, and policy hooks connect scores to runtime outcomes (Block → Alert → Log, JIT approvals, scope minimization).
Scenarios
Dormant bot reactivation: An unused integration wakes up and requests sensitive scopes. Snapshot tools miss it; ClarioSec flags the drift and raises severity with mapped controls.
Cross-domain access: A finance automation begins accessing HR records. Peers never do this. Marked as high-risk drift with an enforcement recommendation and JIT approval option.
Audit & Compliance Implications
Drift is both a security and audit risk. SOC 2 expects access monitoring, GDPR and ISO 27001 require appropriate/minimized data access, and the EU AI Act/ISO/IEC 42001foreground oversight and transparency. Each drift event carries an explainable narrative and control links—creating a durable, signed evidence trail for auditors and boards.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is drift-aware risk scoring?
Continuous scoring that compares each agent’s current behavior to its historical baseline and peer cohort to catch privilege creep, unusual action sequences, and anomalous intent—then explains every score with plain-English evidence.
How is this different from static risk ratings?
Static ratings don’t reflect live behavior. Drift-aware scoring updates as activity changes, ties signals to mapped controls (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001), and reduces noise by considering context, peers, and history.
Which signals does ClarioSec use?
Baseline vs real-time deviations, permission/scope changes, peer comparison, sequence-level anomaly models, lateral-movement hints, dormant/reactivation patterns, and compliance impact—all linked to explainable, audit-ready narratives.
See ClarioSec in action
Discover hidden agents, drift, and policy risks in minutes.